👩💻 Join our community of thousands of amazing developers!
Yesterday I stumbled upon this Google Survey about the selector syntax for the incoming parent selector from Selectors Level 4 module asking for developers’ help on choosing the right syntax for this feature. The official syntax for this has yet to be determined and as of writing there are two proposals grabbing some attention: the :has() pseudo-class (e.g. X:has(Y)) the ^ operator (e.g. ^X Y) ; an old proposal also mentions ! instead of ^ but the idea is the same I think it should be :has(). ...