DIFF.BLOG
New Following Discover Jobs
More
Top Writers Suggest a blog Upvotes plugin
Report bug Contact About Privacy
Sign up
Topics
Follow your own topics →
Menu
New Following Discover Jobs Top Writers
More
Suggest a blog Upvotes plugin Report bug Contact About
Sign up
Privacy Policy
The home for great developer writing.
We surface the best developer writing from thousands of independent blogs, updated daily.
Join Diff.blog
TOPICS

As a thought experiment, imagine only one person had a superintelligent lawyer. They would have an unfair advantage in court — even if they were wrong on the merits. That would lead to a worse society

· Notes Ghed · Aug. 10, 2026, 10:53 p.m.
English Inteligência Artificial Mark Zuckerberg Meta artificial-intelligence ethics philosophy Legal Technology
Summary
The blog post presents a thought experiment regarding the implications of having a superintelligent lawyer available to only one person, suggesting it creates an unfair advantage in the judicial system and ultimately harms society at large. It includes a quote from Mark Zuckerberg's essay, adding a layer of philosophical reflection.
Read full post on manualdousuario.net →
MORE POSTS LIKE THIS
Three reactions to Anthropics’s latest apologia
Gary Marcus · Jul 31, 2026
Technology artificial-intelligence
Pulling the Lever in a Subway Problem
Jeff Kaufman · Nov 10, 2026
ea Morality
Care ethics for people, consequentialism for governments, deontology for judges
Crooked Timber · Nov 10, 2026
academia ethics
ChatGPT knows everything about its users. It will not be a good steward of that power.
Werd · Oct 28, 2026
AI Notable links
More additional blog posts and articles
Terence Tao · Oct 27, 2026
Opinion mathematics
Superintelligence is here
Erik Johannes Husom · Oct 9, 2026
AI Technology
Discover more posts →
AUTHOR
RECENT POSTS FROM THE AUTHOR
Choose how you want to continue.
Continue with GitHub Continue with Google
By continuing, you agree to our Privacy Policy.